Comments on: Facade redesign http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2007/01/31/facade-redesign/ that gum you like is back in style... Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:38:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: timbomb http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2007/01/31/facade-redesign/#comment-1676 Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:51:42 +0000 http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2007/01/31/facade-redesign/#comment-1676 <p>It is very white. But actually I'm talking about the page at <a href="http://www.timbomb.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.timbomb.net</a> - you kind of need to click on the links to see what I mean.</p> It is very white. But actually I’m talking about the page at http://www.timbomb.net - you kind of need to click on the links to see what I mean.

]]> by: spud023 http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2007/01/31/facade-redesign/#comment-1672 Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:08:46 +0000 http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2007/01/31/facade-redesign/#comment-1672 <p>I read your blog (and everyone else's) via Google Reader, so I don't see your design :-(</p> <p>(Unless I want to leave a comment - in which case i need to go to the real page. It looks OK, but a little glary - too much white for me.)</p> <p>|<</p> I read your blog (and everyone else’s) via Google Reader, so I don’t see your design :-(

(Unless I want to leave a comment - in which case i need to go to the real page. It looks OK, but a little glary - too much white for me.)

|<

]]> by: Ralf http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2007/01/31/facade-redesign/#comment-1623 Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:48:23 +0000 http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2007/01/31/facade-redesign/#comment-1623 <p>I like the new one.</p> <p>Once I realised that I had the old look cached and hit reload :-)</p> I like the new one.

Once I realised that I had the old look cached and hit reload :-)

]]>