<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Integral Theory Idealist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2005/11/13/is-integral-theory-idealist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2005/11/13/is-integral-theory-idealist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spud023</title>
		<link>http://www.timbomb.net/blog/2005/11/13/is-integral-theory-idealist/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>spud023</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 04:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timbomb.net/blog/?p=72#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another problem that you raise, but which is not spelled out explicitly, is the question of how language shapes our perceptions of reality/universe/kosmos. This is key to the internality/externality question. I don't know if it makes sense to say:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"This may well be a language expression issue rather than a logical theory issue" &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in this context, as the theory is not really a logical one - in the sense that logics are closed symoblic manipulations - and Wilber is concerned with philosophical issues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#124;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another problem that you raise, but which is not spelled out explicitly, is the question of how language shapes our perceptions of reality/universe/kosmos. This is key to the internality/externality question. I don&#8217;t know if it makes sense to say:</p>

<p>&#8220;This may well be a language expression issue rather than a logical theory issue&#8221; </p>

<p>in this context, as the theory is not really a logical one - in the sense that logics are closed symoblic manipulations - and Wilber is concerned with philosophical issues.</p>

<p>|</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
